Recruiter "Pet Peeve" Survey - Recently, ResumeDoctor.com
undertook the immense project of conducting a survey of over 2,500
recruiters / headhunters throughout the US and Canada to find out
their "Pet Peeves" with resumes. These recruiters stemmed from
varied specialties and industries, (Engineering, Information
Technology, Sales and Marketing, Executive, Biotech, Healthcare,
Administrative, Finance, etc.). ResumeDoctor.com sought to find out
what the recruiter’s likes and dislikes in a resume and what is
going to get a resume read by them.
Here are the top twenty Results of the Survey. Click each item for a
detailed discussion.
-
Burying important info in the resume
-
Gaps in employment
-
1st
or 3rd Person - Resumes in either 1st or 3rd Person
-
No
easy to follow summary
-
Pictures, Graphics or URL links no recruiter will call up
-
Resumes sent in .pdf, .zip files, faxed, web page resumes,
mailed resumes and not sent as WORD Attachment
-
Font Choice - poor font choice or style
-
Objectives or Meaningless Introductions
-
Lying, misleading (especially in terms of education, dates and
inflated titles)
-
Employer info not included and/or not telling what industry or
product candidate worked in
-
Personal Info not relative to the Job
-
Unqualified Candidates - Candidates who apply to positions they
are not qualified for
-
Paragraphs - Long Paragraphs ... not Bullet-points
-
Long Resumes - too long
-
Functional Resumes as opposed to writing a Chronological Resume
- Poor
formatting - boxes, templates, tables, use of header and
footers, etc.
-
Contact Info - none or inaccurate contact info or unprofessional
email addresses
-
Dates not included or inaccurate dates
- Too
Duty Oriented - reads like a job description and fails to
explain what the job seeker’s accomplishments were and how they
did so.
-
Spelling Errors, Typos and Poor Grammar
|
|
|